RESUMO
Context: Children with Down syndrome are at risk for obstructive sleep apnea, which may not be resolved by adenotonsillecotmy, as well as other respiratory disorders that may impact breathing during sleep. Long-term non-invasive ventilation, including continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure delivery, is an alternate treatment strategy. Objective: To assess the use and outcomes of long-term non-invasive ventilation in children with Down syndrome including comparison to other children using long-term non-invasive ventilation. Data Sources: The search strategy for the scoping review used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms for "child" and "non-invasive ventilation." MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and PubMed databases were searched (1990-2021). Study Selection: The scoping review results were searched to identify studies including data on at least three children with Down Syndrome using long-term non-invasive ventilation. Data Extraction: Study characteristics, subject characteristics, technology type, and outcome measurements were extracted. Results: A total of 28 articles included 543 children with Down syndrome using long-term non-invasive ventilation. Children with Down syndrome accounted for 18% of children using long-term non-invasive ventilation. Data on efficacy, feasibility, and adherence in children with Down syndrome are comparable to other children. Children with Down syndrome may have greater difficulty initiating long-term non-invasive ventilation, longer time to establish use, and a higher rate of inability to establish use. Outcome data is limited but suggest favorable impact on cardiac function and attention. Limitations: Articles related to long-term non-invasive ventilation use in adolescents and young adults may have been excluded. Conclusions: Children with Down syndrome make up a significant portion of the population of children using long-term non-invasive ventilation. While there is more limited data available with respect to the use and outcomes for children with Down syndrome compared to the other children, long-term non-invasive ventilation is an effective and well-tolerated therapy with no clear differences in the use or outcomes for children with Down syndrome. Additional work is needed to understand potential challenges around establishing long-term non-invasive ventilation use in children with Down syndrome. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=206533, identifier: CRD206533.
RESUMO
Objectives: To determine whether children with neuromuscular disorders using long-term noninvasive ventilation (NIV), continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure, have improved health outcomes compared with alternative treatment strategies. Data Sources: This systematic review is an extension of a scoping review. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings and free-text terms for "child" and "noninvasive ventilation." Studies of humans from 1990 onward were searched in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and PubMed. The results were reviewed for articles reporting on neuromuscular disorders and health outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, quality of life, lung function, sleep study parameters, and healthcare costs. Data Extraction: Extracted data included study design, study duration, sample size, age, type of NIV, follow-up period, primary disease, and primary and secondary outcome measures. Studies were grouped by primary disease into three groups: spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. Data Synthesis: A total of 50 articles including 1,412 children across 36 different neuromuscular disorders are included in the review. Mortality is lower for children using long-term NIV compared with supportive care across all neuromuscular disease types. Overall, mortality does not differ when comparing the use of NIV with invasive mechanical ventilation, though heterogeneity suggests that mortality with NIV is higher for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 and lower for other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. The impact of long-term NIV on hospitalization rate differed by neuromuscular disease type with lower rates compared with supportive care but higher rates compared with supportive care use for spinal muscular atrophy type 1, and lower rates compared with before NIV for other/multiple neuromuscular diseases. Overall, lung function was unaltered and sleep study parameters were improved from baseline by long-term NIV use. There are few data to assess the impact of long-term NIV use on quality of life and healthcare costs. Conclusions: Long-term NIV for children provides benefit for mortality, hospitalizations, and sleep study parameters for some sub-groups of children with neuromuscular disorders. High risk of bias and low study quality preclude strong conclusions.
